Search

Help

Page 1 of 82. Showing 812 results (0.012 seconds)

  1. Re: [SAA.ACT] Published special activity area - activation (NOTAM)

    Yes, the problem is with Activity name="Aerodrome/Heliport traffic", when using Cancellation Event.  The Cancellation NOTAM TXT coding results with confusing text:  AERODROME TRAFFIC CANCELLED WITHIN AREA <area_name> When using more realistic activity, cancellation NOTAM TXT is clear: PARACHUTE JUMPING EXERCISE CANCE
  2. Re: [SAA.ACT] Published special activity area - activation (NOTAM)

    I'm not sure if I understand the question. There is a list of "normal" activity types (see list in 4). For completeness all were listed which are theoretically available in AIXM and the "strange" ones for this scenario were just marked with an asterix. Agreening on the "normal/usual" activity types wasn't so easy eith
  3. Re: [SFC.CON] Surface condition report - decoding

    With respect to content, see also my comment above for the abbreviated heading. What is provided as "abbreviated heading/abbr_heading" is indeed incorrect and the start of the message is missing.
  4. Re: [2.0] OTHER

    Not necessarily. The NOTAM code would depend on the content of the message. 
    Digital NOTAM / … / [2.0] OTHER28 Jan 2023
  5. Re: Contributors

    Could you please add Peter Cagan from Indra Avitech. Thank you.
    Digital NOTAM / … / Contributors27 Jan 2023
  6. Re: Contributors

    Could you please add VANACEK Jan; Frequentis, Czech Republic? 
    Digital NOTAM / … / Contributors26 Jan 2023
  7. Re: Contributors

    Could you please add GERMAIN François ? Thank you
    Digital NOTAM / … / Contributors26 Jan 2023
  8. Re: [2.0] OTHER

    Is that kind of Q-Code = 'XXXX' ?
    Digital NOTAM / … / [2.0] OTHER26 Jan 2023
  9. Re: Contributors

    Could you please update IDS with IDS AirNav (an ENAV Group company) and add Claudio Corona and Enzo Brunetti ? thanks in advance
    Digital NOTAM / … / Contributors26 Jan 2023
  10. Re: [SFC.CON] Surface condition report - decoding

    abbr_heading = "SW" "(1)" "(2)Event.textNOTAM.number" "AHP.BL.designator" "RWY.TD.overallContaminant.observationTime(3)". Is there some difference here or rationale to not report here the abbreviated heading explanations of ICAO Guidance on the Issuance of SNOWTAM ? Enclosed text from ICAO Guidance material: <<