Page 1 of 82. Showing 812 results (0.012 seconds)
Re: [SAA.ACT] Published special activity area - activation (NOTAM)
Yes, the problem is with Activity name="Aerodrome/Heliport traffic", when using Cancellation Event. The Cancellation NOTAM TXT coding results with confusing text: AERODROME TRAFFIC CANCELLED WITHIN AREA <area_name> When using more realistic activity, cancellation NOTAM TXT is clear: PARACHUTE JUMPING EXERCISE CANCERe: [SAA.ACT] Published special activity area - activation (NOTAM)
I'm not sure if I understand the question. There is a list of "normal" activity types (see list in 4). For completeness all were listed which are theoretically available in AIXM and the "strange" ones for this scenario were just marked with an asterix. Agreening on the "normal/usual" activity types wasn't so easy eithRe: [SFC.CON] Surface condition report - decoding
With respect to content, see also my comment above for the abbreviated heading. What is provided as "abbreviated heading/abbr_heading" is indeed incorrect and the start of the message is missing.Re: [2.0] OTHER
Not necessarily. The NOTAM code would depend on the content of the message.Re: Contributors
Could you please add Peter Cagan from Indra Avitech. Thank you.Re: Contributors
Could you please add VANACEK Jan; Frequentis, Czech Republic?Re: Contributors
Could you please add GERMAIN François ? Thank youRe: [2.0] OTHER
Is that kind of Q-Code = 'XXXX' ?Re: Contributors
Could you please update IDS with IDS AirNav (an ENAV Group company) and add Claudio Corona and Enzo Brunetti ? thanks in advanceRe: [SFC.CON] Surface condition report - decoding
abbr_heading = "SW" "(1)" "(2)Event.textNOTAM.number" "AHP.BL.designator" "RWY.TD.overallContaminant.observationTime(3)". Is there some difference here or rationale to not report here the abbreviated heading explanations of ICAO Guidance on the Issuance of SNOWTAM ? Enclosed text from ICAO Guidance material: <<