Difference between revisions of "Black/Grey List History"
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This page records changes made to the Black/Grey list since the 23rd May 2019 white list. It is maintained for information. | This page records changes made to the Black/Grey list since the 23rd May 2019 white list. It is maintained for information. | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''31st July 2019:''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | It has been decided to add the Thales EVR-750 (L22 version) to the Grey list, since it is observed to perform poorly on the SITA network. It does however perform relatively well on the ARINC network so the issue may not be an issue with the avionics but rather a combination of the avionics and the SITA network. | ||
'''27th June 2019:''' | '''27th June 2019:''' |
Revision as of 09:29, 31 July 2019
This page records changes made to the Black/Grey list since the 23rd May 2019 white list. It is maintained for information.
31st July 2019:
It has been decided to add the Thales EVR-750 (L22 version) to the Grey list, since it is observed to perform poorly on the SITA network. It does however perform relatively well on the ARINC network so the issue may not be an issue with the avionics but rather a combination of the avionics and the SITA network.
27th June 2019:
It was decided to black list B748 aircraft with RC 2100 VDRs and CMU900 CMUs. These aircraft are observed to have a high PA rate, despite the avoinics performing satisfactorily in other configurations. The poor performance is observed across different operators and different ANSPs.
23rd May 2019:
Following feedback from Rockwell Collins and some consequent analysis it been decided to change the Black listing of aircraft with RIU-4010 equipment from all aircraft with RIU-4010 installed to be just aircraft types BCS1 and BCS3 with an RIU-4010 and Data Link Communications Application (DCLA) version 810-0315-100 and Integrated Modular Avionics (IMA) version 810-0311-2B0005.
10th May 2019:
It was decided to remove the CMU900 before version ending -505 from the Black list. It had originally been included because the -505 version was identified as 'best-in-class' in the ELSA study, but in-service performance data shows no significant difference between the -505 version and earlier versions.